The past few weeks have been good for stress.
Two labs published studies supporting the idea that stress during sensitive periods in early development can cause epigenetic changes affecting how an organism turns out. These studies look at mice and humans, respectively. I’m diving into the mouse study today — it’s got two kinds of epigenetics: an inherited, probably chromatin-mark imprinting angle; and an miRNA angle. I’ll get to the human study from the Kobor lab next time.
As an aside, I find “stress and epigenetics” especially interesting because I’m always looking for clues about how this new-ish field is perceived and represented by the lay public, and “stress” is a lay-public magnet. As I’ve talked about before, aside from pharma and diagnostics companies, life-science professionals, and general science dorks (ahem), the other folks who’re most interested in epigenetics are the all-around mystics. Anyway, it’s the stress connection that they seem to love. But these two recent articles seem like they’ve escaped that attention, while picking up some mainstream coverage here, here, and here. Still, it’s not much, which surprises me.
Anyway, in the mouse study, Christopher Morgan and Tracy Bale at the University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine followed up their lab’s previous finding that stressing out pregnant mice during the first week of gestation — with constant light, the smell of foxes, and other painless irritations — dysmasculinized male offspring.
That is, compared to the sons of unstressed moms, this first crop of males showed female-like behavioral responses when hung by the tail and when forced to learn a maze, and they reacted more strongly to being trapped in a small cage, as judged by corticosterone levels. They also showed shorter anogenital distances, which I won’t need to detail, right?
Well, in Morgan’s and Bale’s newest work in the Journal of Neuroscience, they find that the second-generation offspring of stressed pregnant moms were dysmasculinized compared to control mice too. And through the male line — these were the sons of sons of stressed moms — these males inherited the same tail-hanging behavior and reduced anogenital distances. But they weren’t statistically different from controls in the maze or in corticosterone response to stress. Each group had fewer than 10 mice, so a large study might prove more statistical differences.
Only gametes appeared to transmit these traits, but not through genetics — the authors don’t go into it, but that leaves epigenetic chromatin marks, and possible environmental effects.
The other epigenetic connection is really the point of the whole experiment. The U Penn scientists found three miRNAs with much lower expression in second-gen dysmasculinized mice, all of which target ß-glycan, a member of the TGFß family. That’s important because Morgan and Bale were looking for connections to in utero brain masculinization — there’s evidence that’s part of what’s behind many sexually dimorphic neurological and behavioral problems, including schizophrenia and autism.
Interestingly, in pituitary gonadotrophs and gonadal Leydig or theca cells, ß-glycan is involved in regulating the release of gonadal hormones (MacConell et al., 2002; Chapman and Woodruff, 2003; Wiater et al., 2009). As a role for ß-glycan in neurodevelopment has not been identified, our data suggest that it may serve an unappreciated role in the organization of the sexually dimorphic brain.
It’s not a smoking gun, but it ties in nicely with a lot of recent interest in epigenetics and glucocorticoids, which are the human analog of rodent corticosterones (here’s a free review of epigenetics in glucocorts). In case you missed a big part of this, McGill University’s Michael Meaney and colleagues recently reported (full text) in Nature Neuroscience that suicide victims who experienced childhood abuse showed greater promoter methylation of the glucocorticosteroid gene, with lower mRNA levels, than did suicide victims who hadn’t been abused.
That study went a long way toward revealing a bit in humans what others previously found in rodents — that there’s an early life stage when the glucocorticoid pathway is susceptible to epigenetic regulation, and that affects mental health. In the rodent paper, maternal care epigenetically reprogrammed pups at the glucocort receptor in their hippocampuses.
So, stress, glucocorticoids, mental health, and critical developmental windows. The paper from the Kobor lab goes into the developmental window a bit more — in humans.
(Image “staircase window 2″ by Flickr user extranoise reproduced here under a Creative Commons license.)
# Christopher P. Morgan, & # Tracy L. Bale (2011). Early Prenatal Stress Epigenetically Programs Dysmasculinization in Second-Generation Offspring via the Paternal Lineage Journal of Neuroscience : 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1887-11.2011

Along with dorks, scientists and mystics, midwives too are interested in epigenetic effects. Midwives work with pregnant women to reduce stress as we recognise the sequelae of stress on pregnancy, labour, birth, and subsequently, on the postnatal events, including newborn behaviour and therefore attachment, breastfeeding… the list goes on. Information such as the latest work, showing the intergenerational effects of too much stress and at the wrong time, validates the view that to support healthy child development, society needs to take care of mothers. Thanks for your blog and your explanation.
Hi Carolyn — I hadn’t even guessed midwives would be interested in epigenetics. I’d say these results are somewhat consistent with your interpretation, but only research on birth stress per se would support an epigenetic contribution to healthy child development. If you’ve got a link to that kind of research, please share it! I’d be more than interested to read up–it’s a newborn field, so it’s still got a lot of surprises for us all.
I am personally finding this subject provides some insight into the behavioural difficulties my son (8 yrs) has experienced since birth which is having a significant negative impact on his life. I experienced high levels of stress during pregnancy from four months until three weeks before he was born. We have had a number of psychological assessments performed on him over the last couple of years with nothing conclusive showing up. Oppositional Defiance Disorder seems to be what he is most likely to be diagnosed with, but I can’t help but think that this diagnosis is given to kids that don’t fit into any other category and there appears to be no effective treatment for it, so I am sceptical about how going with the diagnosis of ODD is going to help him. He is showing quite a number of Sensory Processing issues; however, Sensory Processing Disorder is not something that is widely accepted by the medical community. Whilst these studies don’t really help with knowing how to deal with his psychological issues it does go some way towards helping me to understand why we are experiencing these issues.
Hi Jacinta — here’s where I have to play it safe and say that we’re just in the dawn of this era of epigenetics, and that there are a lot of factors in play during early human development. Having said that, I’m glad to have provided you with some insight, and I hope it starts you on the way to real solutions.
Jacinta,
I’m reading this article for the same reason. I have two boys (teens now) who struggle in life and we can’t quite nail down the right diagnosis or the right help. I too had difficult pregnancies due to auto-immune issues and my poor boys have suffered so much with what I now term “hidden disabilities”. I’m coming to the conclusion that the problems lie in their epigentics. How I wish we were further in this field of study!
Hi Juls,
Thanks for stopping by! To tell you the truth, we just don’t know enough about autoimmune diseases or epigenetics to say definitively whether the one can result from the other. I know that’s not a real answer, but on a personal level, I have a good feeling that epigenetics will shed considerable light on how autoimmunity happens. When and if that’ll happen, though, I have no idea. But I hope the future brings a cure.